open-autonomous-connection/luaj
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 2 Wiki Activity

Is this project dead? #112

New Issue
Closed
opened 2023-04-23 05:56:58 +00:00 by 2dpdlja496or43iq · 10 comments
2dpdlja496or43iq commented 2023-04-23 05:56:58 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Which is the serious continuation of it?

https://github.com/LuaAbility/luaj

https://github.com/hashsploit/luaj

https://github.com/fabrice-ducos/luaj

https://github.com/elroy93/luaj

https://github.com/alekso56/luaj

https://github.com/wagyourtail/luaj

https://github.com/asiekierka/luaj

https://github.com/farmboy0/luaj

@MINUTE1084 @hashsploit @fabrice-ducos @elroy93 @alekso56 @wagyourtail @asiekierka @farmboy0

Which is the serious continuation of it? https://github.com/LuaAbility/luaj https://github.com/hashsploit/luaj https://github.com/fabrice-ducos/luaj https://github.com/elroy93/luaj https://github.com/alekso56/luaj https://github.com/wagyourtail/luaj https://github.com/asiekierka/luaj https://github.com/farmboy0/luaj @MINUTE1084 @hashsploit @fabrice-ducos @elroy93 @alekso56 @wagyourtail @asiekierka @farmboy0
👍 2
asiekierka commented 2023-04-23 08:09:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I recommend using the Insights -> Network tab to figure out which fork is most active.

My fork was initially created specifically for the OpenComputers project, and I have no plans on further maintenance beyond that.

I recommend using the Insights -> Network tab to figure out which fork is most active. My fork was initially created specifically for the [OpenComputers](https://github.com/MightyPirates/OpenComputers/) project, and I have no plans on further maintenance beyond that.
fabrice-ducos commented 2023-04-23 12:12:04 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

You can also use Insights -> Forks.

My fork was an attempt to upgrade the luaj project from old JDKs (1.2 - 1.4) to JDK 8+, and also with newer versions of ant (1.10+).

It was performed as a subproject of another personal project of mine, and it seems to work with newer JDKs (even 17) for JSE. I managed to run it successfully on Windows 10, Linux Ubuntu 22.04 and MacOSX Monterey 12.6.3.

However I wouldn't recommend it for production if it's what you have got in mind (at least not before thorough testing first).

The issue is that I am much less familiar with ant than with maven or gradle.

If your project includes deployment on mobiles, my fork is not for your use case. I am not familiar with the JME development and did not manage to compile it in this case (JME doesn't support many new language constructs, including generics). Therefore the JME part is not compiled by default in my fork (though the code is still there, and a compilation can still be attempted, with no guarantee, with ant all or ant jar-jme).

Best wishes

You can also use Insights -> Forks. My [fork](https://github.com/fabrice-ducos/luaj) was an attempt to upgrade the luaj project from old JDKs (1.2 - 1.4) to JDK 8+, and also with newer versions of ant (1.10+). It was performed as a subproject of another personal project of mine, and it seems to work with newer JDKs (even 17) for JSE. I managed to run it successfully on Windows 10, Linux Ubuntu 22.04 and MacOSX Monterey 12.6.3. However I wouldn't recommend it for production if it's what you have got in mind (at least not before thorough testing first). The issue is that I am much less familiar with _ant_ than with _maven_ or _gradle_. If your project includes deployment on mobiles, my fork is not for your use case. I am not familiar with the JME development and did not manage to compile it in this case (JME doesn't support many new language constructs, including generics). Therefore the JME part is not compiled by default in my fork (though the code is still there, and a compilation can still be attempted, with no guarantee, with `ant all` or `ant jar-jme`). Best wishes
wagyourtail commented 2023-04-23 23:30:07 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I merged a few of the pr's here and use mine for https://github.com/jsmacros/jsmacros-lua im not exactly actively maintaining it, but if people were to send pr's I would read them over at some poimt

I merged a few of the pr's here and use mine for https://github.com/jsmacros/jsmacros-lua im not exactly actively maintaining it, but if people were to send pr's I would read them over at some poimt
👍 1
fabrice-ducos commented 2023-04-24 08:28:20 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Dear @wagyourtail,
I have sent a pull request from my fork, if you want to consider it, with a caveat regarding the drop of JME support.
I would have preferred to keep supporting JME, but JME seems to be legacy and maintaining it implies to be stuck to JDK 1.4

Best regards

Dear @wagyourtail, I have sent a pull request from my fork, if you want to consider it, with a caveat regarding the drop of JME support. I would have preferred to keep supporting JME, but JME seems to be legacy and maintaining it implies to be stuck to JDK 1.4 Best regards
farmboy0 commented 2023-04-24 09:02:50 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I did extensive clean up and rework of luaj in my fork, common formatting, convert to maven, tests as junit5 as well as some bug fixes but Im not actively maintaining it. So while anyone is free to use my work I do not plan to go through the work again to make it match another fork.

I did extensive clean up and rework of luaj in my fork, common formatting, convert to maven, tests as junit5 as well as some bug fixes but Im not actively maintaining it. So while anyone is free to use my work I do not plan to go through the work again to make it match another fork.
👍 1
wagyourtail commented 2023-04-24 10:10:06 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

@fabrice-ducos part of my fork was merging @farmboy0 's fork, which converts to maven. iirc this includes java 8 update...
(yeah maybe need to do something if we want jme to actually work properly there still)

as well as

@fabrice-ducos part of my fork was merging @farmboy0 's fork, which converts to maven. iirc this includes java 8 update... (yeah maybe need to do something if we want jme to actually work properly there still) as well as * #48 * #76 * add file/line to LuaError * a patch for #94 (iirc one of my users had this issue so I *needed* to fix it) * shade core into jme/jre jars * some better java object interop support * a change to metatables on java objects so they're per object
fabrice-ducos commented 2023-04-30 23:25:24 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Dear @farmboy0, @wagyourtail.
Thank you for these updates. I agree that it's the way to go.
Best regards.

Dear @farmboy0, @wagyourtail. Thank you for these updates. I agree that it's the way to go. Best regards.
MINUTE1084 commented 2023-05-11 00:29:09 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Hi.

My project was created for the Spigot plugin for Minecraft.

It's a fix for some issues with the Spigot API integration, so there probably won't be any significant modifications for other projects.

It's not currently in development, so I don't think there will be any further research.

I apologize for the late response and thank you for your interest in the project.

Hi. My project was created for the Spigot plugin for Minecraft. It's a fix for some issues with the Spigot API integration, so there probably won't be any significant modifications for other projects. It's not currently in development, so I don't think there will be any further research. I apologize for the late response and thank you for your interest in the project.
anthonywww commented 2023-08-08 21:42:45 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Hi.

I'd recommend using @wagyourtail's fork (combined branch) as it seems to be the most mature?

Other fork details:

I noticed @lenrik1589's fork added Java 17 use of record and properly named the classes in core to PascalCase. According to their commit message they also are moving things away from reflections to lambdas.

e4f13dd191

Looks like @hashsploit's fork is no longer maintained, it appears the only changes was to remove JME support and add support for Java 1.8+ for use in Maven + JitPack.

https://github.com/hashsploit/clank/blob/feature/overhaul/build.gradle.kts#L64

I plan on using luaj in conjunction with LWJGL3 for scripting.

Thanks for keeping this project alive!

Hi. I'd recommend using @wagyourtail's fork (`combined` branch) as it seems to be the most mature? <details><summary>Other fork details:</summary> <p> I noticed @lenrik1589's fork added Java 17 use of <code>record</code> and properly named the classes in core to PascalCase. According to their commit message they also are moving things away from reflections to lambdas. https://github.com/lenrik1589/luaj/commit/e4f13dd1914b7bba8078556c4f5e0e93cefe8672 ---- Looks like @hashsploit's fork is no longer maintained, it appears the only changes was to remove JME support and add support for Java 1.8+ for use in Maven + JitPack. https://github.com/hashsploit/clank/blob/feature/overhaul/build.gradle.kts#L64 </p> </details> I plan on using luaj in conjunction with LWJGL3 for scripting. Thanks for keeping this project alive!
lenrik1589 commented 2023-08-17 11:39:13 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

I noticed @lenrik1589's fork added Java 17 use of record and properly named the classes in core to PascalCase. According to their commit message they also are moving things away from reflections to lambdas.

i am not sure i wish to continue working on the project, as i worked on it in conjunction with Kingdom-of-The-Moon/FiguraRewriteRewrite and (now inaccessible, likely private) Kingdom-of-The-Moon/luaj, which transitioned into FiguraMC/Figura and respectively FiguraMC/luaj but I have been removed from the team of people who work on it which made me lose all motivation to continue active work, i might keep working on it, but even slower than i did before…

> I noticed @lenrik1589's fork added Java 17 use of `record` and properly named the classes in core to PascalCase. According to their commit message they also are moving things away from reflections to lambdas. i am not sure i wish to continue working on the project, as i worked on it in conjunction with [Kingdom-of-The-Moon/FiguraRewriteRewrite](https://github.com/Kingdom-of-The-Moon/FiguraRewriteRewrite) and (now inaccessible, likely private) [Kingdom-of-The-Moon/luaj](https://github.com/Kingdom-of-The-Moon/luaj), which transitioned into [FiguraMC/Figura](https://github.com/FiguraMC/Figura) and respectively [FiguraMC/luaj](https://github.com/FiguraMC/luaj) but I have been removed from the team of people who work on it which made me lose all motivation to continue active work, i might keep working on it, but even slower than i did before…
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
 duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
open-autonomous-connection
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: open-autonomous-connection/luaj#112
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?